State Legality MatrixForced Reset TriggersDistrict of Columbia

Are Forced Reset Triggers Legal in District of Columbia?

Statute-cited, last verified 2026-07-28 · State detail verified 2026-07-31

Status
Banned
Verified
2026-07-28

Banned

No. Reached by the District's broad machine-gun definition, which includes conversion parts.

Controlling law: D.C. Code § 7-2501.01(10) (definition); § 22-4514

Contested entry

Litigation Status and Details

The machine-gun definition includes any combination of parts designed for converting a firearm to a machine gun; possession of machine guns and such parts is prohibited under § 22-4514.

The statute in practice

District of Columbia Law in Detail

District of Columbia Code section 7-2501.01 defines a machine gun by automatic fire of more than one shot, without manual reloading, through a single trigger function. The definition also includes a machine-gun frame or receiver, parts designed and intended solely and exclusively for conversion, and combinations of parts from which a machine gun can be assembled under the possessor's control.

The current code does not create a separate generic rate-increasing-trigger category. Its automatic-fire and conversion-parts clauses, together with the District's separate possession offense, supply the relevant statutory comparison.

What it means for you

Practical Notes

Read section 7-2501.01 with D.C. Code section 22-4514. The District regulates covered parts as well as completed weapons, so possession of a detached component can require its own analysis.

Sources

Federal law

Federal baseline

Under the 2025 DOJ settlement with Rare Breed Triggers, an FRT fires one round per trigger function and is not an NFA machine gun federally. The settlement covers rifles and grip-forward pistols; it does not extend to grip-fed handguns (Glock, S&W M&P, Canik), whose federal FRT status remains less settled. State bans operate independently of federal law through broader state machine-gun, trigger-activator, or rate-of-fire definitions.

Scope: Forced reset triggers (Rare Breed FRT-15, Dairyland Defender, and similar) and forced-reset selectors (AR Super Safety, ARC-Fire). One round per trigger function. Binary triggers are a separate class.

Common questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Are forced reset triggers legal in District of Columbia?

No. Reached by the District's broad machine-gun definition, which includes conversion parts. Controlling law: D.C. Code § 7-2501.01(10) (definition); § 22-4514.

What law covers forced reset triggers in District of Columbia?

The controlling law is D.C. Code § 7-2501.01(10) (definition); § 22-4514. Reached by the District's broad machine-gun definition, which includes conversion parts.

Are forced reset triggers legal under federal law?

Under the 2025 DOJ settlement with Rare Breed Triggers, an FRT fires one round per trigger function and is not an NFA machine gun federally. The settlement covers rifles and grip-forward pistols; it does not extend to grip-fed handguns (Glock, S&W M&P, Canik), whose federal FRT status remains less settled. State bans operate independently of federal law through broader state machine-gun, trigger-activator, or rate-of-fire definitions.

Related coverage

Full 50-State Map

More District of Columbia Gun Laws

Forced Reset Triggers Laws by State