State Legality Matrix / Binary Triggers / Washington
Statute-cited, last verified 2026-07-10
No. Falls within Washington's machine-gun definition covering mechanisms not requiring that the trigger be pressed for each shot.
Controlling law: RCW 9.41.010; RCW 9.41.190
The release-fired round places a binary trigger within RCW 9.41.010's machine-gun definition, effectively banning it. Note the asymmetry: Washington does NOT ban forced reset triggers, which fire one round per pull.
Binary triggers are legal under federal law and are not machine guns under 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b); ATF treats the trigger pull and the trigger release as two separate functions of the trigger, so one round is fired per function. Cargill v. Garland (2024) concerned bump stocks, not binary triggers, and does not change this.
Scope: Binary triggers (Franklin Armory BFSIII and similar): fire one round on trigger pull and one on release. Forced reset triggers are a separate class.
No. Falls within Washington's machine-gun definition covering mechanisms not requiring that the trigger be pressed for each shot. Controlling law: RCW 9.41.010; RCW 9.41.190.
The controlling law is RCW 9.41.010; RCW 9.41.190. Falls within Washington's machine-gun definition covering mechanisms not requiring that the trigger be pressed for each shot.
Binary triggers are legal under federal law and are not machine guns under 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b); ATF treats the trigger pull and the trigger release as two separate functions of the trigger, so one round is fired per function. Cargill v. Garland (2024) concerned bump stocks, not binary triggers, and does not change this.